------- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 19:35 ------- Hm, with this patch we hit the subsequent assert on x86_64 (as opposed to i686). I'm looking into this further.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42366
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:36:01 -0800
------- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 19:35 ------- Hm, with this patch we hit the subsequent assert on x86_64 (as opposed to i686). I'm looking into this further.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42366