OK, thank you, I was thinking that that %' was wrong. It tried to find information about %' or gcc-internal-format with google, but missed. So these all 33 typos are not typos. My mistake. Sorry. PLS, mark this bug fixed.
Jorma K. 2009/12/22 joseph at codesourcery dot com <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>: > > > ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-12-22 12:15 > ------- > Subject: Re: New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot > file > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote: > >> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot: > > This is not a useful bug report. You have extracted some lines, but > without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of > them. If you think different things are wrong with different messages, > each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different > parts of the compiler are maintained by different people. So file > separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the > compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong. If you > think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you > think it should be instead. > >> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145 >> #, gcc-internal-format >> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition" >> >> #: c-decl.c:1533 >> #, gcc-internal-format >> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name >> list declaration" >> >> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, >> but >> I do not mark them any more. > > What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here? Both %' and %qE > are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages > should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be > used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating > that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so > %qE should appear in the translations). > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458 > >
