------- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-13 16:22 -------
While looking at this one, I found two oddities:
* There are two similar special-case handlers for ISOCBINDING_NULL_[FUN]PTR,
one in trans-expr.c(gfc_conv_initializer), the other in trans-const.c
(gfc_conv_constant). They may be redundant?
* Both these checks create a 'gfc_int_expr(0)' as replacement value, wouldn't
a
'null_pointer_node' be technically more correct?
I'm out of this one, trans-* is dark magic *uhhh*
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41298
