------- Comment #1 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-12-07 08:13
-------
I'm wondering if this is not an application of the name hiding rule described
in the IEC 14882:1998 (3.3.7) that says here that the class name T::X is hidden
by the object static int T::X i, so T::X y refers to the object's name not the
class. Making the test invalid. Not certain, just a thought.
This could be reduced as
struct A
{
#ifdef X_MEMBER
static int X;
#endif
#ifdef X_NAME
struct X { };
#endif
} ;
void foo(void)
{
#ifdef X_NAME
A::X y;
#endif
#ifdef X_MEMBER
A::X = 1;
#endif
}
if both X_NAME and X_MEMBER are defined the line A::X y; becomes invalid.
--
christian dot bruel at st dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |christian dot bruel at st
| |dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32066
