------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-06 16:19 ------- > It would be (slightly) preferable if the test case didn't contain any > kind=4 or kind=8 specification. I wrote them, but I can't remember why > I put the kind=xxx in there.
This PR seems to have been fixed along this line. Before I close it, does someone remenber when? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35939
