------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 00:05 -------
There are two different issues here, only is the place where we instantiated
foo<bool> is wrong but the second issue is even weird and I think there is a
C++ defect report about it (do fundamental types have associated namespace).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|gcc should reject code |fundamental type have an
|violating the two-phase |associated namespace?
|look-up rules (related to |
|bug 42291) |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42292
