------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 15:57 -------
> (In reply to comment #3)
> Richard is probably right, it should be clearly marked against the branch,
I have now set "Reported against" to 'fortran-dev', marked it in the Subject
line and in 'known to work/fail'
Backtrace:
mio_pointer_ref (gp=0x28) at
/home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2237
2237 p = get_pointer (*((char **) gp));
(gdb) bt
#0 mio_pointer_ref (gp=0x28) at
/home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2237
#1 0x00000000004f8da9 in mio_symbol_ref (symp=<value optimized out>) at
/home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2498
#2 0x00000000004f90e9 in mio_typebound_proc (proc=0x154b908) at
/home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:3352
#3 0x00000000004fa344 in mio_component (c=0x154b880) at
/home/tob/projects/fortran-dev/gcc/fortran/module.c:2362
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |fortran-dev
Known to work| |4.5.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-12-04 15:57:20
date| |
Summary|ICE: segmentation fault |[fortran-dev Regression]
| |ICE: segmentation fault
Version|unknown |fortran-dev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42274
