------- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-03 03:11 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > We still are seeing a few residual failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 even > after > the removal of Taras Glek's patches from gcc trunk. The remaining failures > are... > > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/fntry1.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow3.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/vbase1.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/vbase2.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh16.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh17.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh23.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh39.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh40.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh41.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/eh3.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init7.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/vbase2.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eh990323-1.C execution test > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eh990323-5.C execution test > > so more than a single patch was involved in these new c++ failures. >
This is at r154931 and these failures all existed in r154891 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41988#c21). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42254
