------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:33 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> It would be possible to avoid the default construction by replacing that
> member
> with two overloads of resize, but I'm not sure it's worth doing.
The C++03 standard only lists the function with the default value so this is
invalid.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42242
