------- Comment #9 from sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de 2009-11-29 02:29 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > An implementation is probably expected to shrink bucket_count when size > shrinks, so the complexity should still be O(size). That would be good > for memory use anyway, so why's that not done? >
shrinking invalidates iterators, doesn't it? erase() is specified not to invalidate iterators. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975
