------- Comment #27 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-28 15:56 ------- Created an attachment (id=19171) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19171&action=view) Proposed patch
I think the attached should be a better patch than the one previously proposed. I don't have any real way to test this beyond the posted testcase, though, so I would be grateful if you could give it a more thorough kicking. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40836
