------- Comment #4 from david dot resnick at comverse dot com 2009-11-20 18:56 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > In standard C, a size 0 array is forbidden, at least in C99 doc I have > > handy, > Yes, but it's a long-standing GNU extension: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.2/gcc/Zero-Length.html#Zero-Length > The C++ front end says: > /* As an extension we allow zero-sized arrays. We always allow > them in system headers because glibc uses them. */ > Maybe the C++ front-end could be made stricter, so that it accepts char b[0] > (like the C front end) but not char b[] (which is a C99 flexible array member, > and must be the last member)
OK, but if you read that link the whole rationale is to do with it being the last field in a struct, not an internal member, right? Seems like there is no possible use in an internal member, and not diagnosing this as warnable means you don't notice if, say, someone accidentally adds something after the flexible array member. Which happened to us, which is why I noticed this issue. If this will break existing usage, I see the reason not to change. But I'm curious what possible use a non-terminal zero sized array in a struct might have. -David -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
