------- Comment #28 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-11-20
00:13 -------
Why do we have....
case dw_val_class_const_double:
switch (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
{
case 8:
return DW_FORM_data2;
case 16:
return DW_FORM_data4;
case 32:
return DW_FORM_data8;
case 64:
default:
return DW_FORM_block1;
}
in gcc/dwarf2out.c? Almost all of the other case statements in the subroutine
value_format() have
default:
gcc_unreachable ();
for the default case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41473