------- Comment #28 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-11-20 00:13 ------- Why do we have....
case dw_val_class_const_double: switch (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT) { case 8: return DW_FORM_data2; case 16: return DW_FORM_data4; case 32: return DW_FORM_data8; case 64: default: return DW_FORM_block1; } in gcc/dwarf2out.c? Almost all of the other case statements in the subroutine value_format() have default: gcc_unreachable (); for the default case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41473