------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 18:57 ------- For
case TYPE_LEA: operands[2] = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0)); return "lea{l}\t{%a2, %k0|%k0, %a2}"; Won't we get "(zero_extend:DI ...)" for operands[2]? Don't we want "(plus:SI ...)" instead? -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41665