------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-10 18:57 -------
For

    case TYPE_LEA:
      operands[2] = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0));
      return "lea{l}\t{%a2, %k0|%k0, %a2}";

Won't we get "(zero_extend:DI ...)" for operands[2]? Don't we
want "(plus:SI ...)" instead?


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41665

Reply via email to