------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-10-09 14:51 ------- Sorry, your 'however' confused me. So, you *are* linking versus the new library, right? In that case it is *incorrect* to pass -D_GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING in the command line, since your new library has not been built with it.
As a matter of fact, the use itself of -D_GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING is **completely** unsupported, in other terms the user is **never** supposed to pass it, only the configure can internally appropriately set _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING basing on --enable-fully-dynamic-string. Somebody should tell Apple ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41645