------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 22:28 ------- So they want a way to turn off progbits instead? That seems better than doing extended inline-asm at the top level.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:29:27 -0700
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 22:28 ------- So they want a way to turn off progbits instead? That seems better than doing extended inline-asm at the top level.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045