------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 11:39 ------- Andi, is the current wording sufficient or is something missing/unclear?
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi?r1=152490&r2=152489&pathrev=152490 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41591
