------- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-09-30 15:14 ------- Subject: Re: ICE in duplicate_node_data, at ipa-pure-const.c:633
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > ------- Comment #10 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-09-30 15:11 ------- > Subject: Re: ICE in duplicate_node_data, at ipa-pure-const.c:633 > > > The merge decisions should be all settled at that point. I don't know > > if checking cgraph->decl is reliable though (I didn't trace to where > > we allocate and not fill that node). > > It would be probably better to simply return NULL instead of allocating > fake node outside cgraph. It will make code not aware of the fact that > some nodes disappear at reading time happilly ICE too. Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Or read in summary data before merging nodes ... Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41487
