------- Comment #4 from Knut dot Franke at gmx dot de 2009-09-25 10:34 ------- Subject: Re: segfault when using implicit dynamic allocation
On Friday 25 September 2009 10:55:34 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > This is expected as that variable is still on the stack. Increase > the stack limit and you will see that the size which it crashes increases. D'oh. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41466
