------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 18:59 ------- I think it is safe to ignore it, as you've done. It is target specific which bits are masked away and how. It is enough that for LO_SUM we look up the SYMBOL_REF referenced by the second operand.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41411
