------- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 11:08 ------- (In reply to comment #2)
> According to these rules, your asm should be written as:
>
> asm ("fmulp": "=t" (ret): "0" (ret), "u" (tmp): "st(1)");
So, invalid.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15319
