------- Comment #17 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 21:18 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Is this for fixed-form or free-form source code?
> For fixed-form, the above should parse as
> 'volatile doubleprecisiona'
>
Yes, I've just discovered that.
Then the current behaviour is correct.
--
mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41335
