------- Comment #5 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 10:26 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times \(DIE \(.*?\) DW_TAG_in lined_subroutine 6
Le 05/09/2009 12:05, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org a écrit : > They are platform dependent in that non-register operations are accounted > according to their move cost. Thus if at all it is > > int* a = 0; > a[0] = var3; > > that makes the difference. You can either increase optimization level > or the inlining parameters. Thanks Richard. So, would adding __attribute__((always_inline)) to those function be acceptable ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41272
