------- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 19:09 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > (In reply to comment #6) > > > I think I found the issue within gfortran for mingw. > > > > I think you have this backwards. "the issue within mingw > > for gfortran" would be a better description of the issue. > > It is afterall mingw that defines off_t. > > > > Well, in fact it is MS here. But we on mingw-w64 think at the moment about to > add an override option for this by defining _LARGE_FILES. But we have to plan > this in more detail. Would this be an option for you? >
If the changes are confined to libgfortran, then I suspect that the above would be acceptable (although I haven't worked on libgfortran recently); as long as the changes can be wrapped in '#define __MINGW__' (or an equivalent). If front-end changes are required, then that would be much more difficult to accommodate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40812
