------- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-09-03 10:25 ------- Subject: Re: [LTO] Segfault using -flto with -fvar-tracking-assignments
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #6 from rmansfield at qnx dot com 2009-09-02 22:50 ------- > (In reply to comment #5) > > Note that in general you have to repeat all options on the link command > > line, > > otherwise you are building with -O0 there. > > Yep, I realize that. I just came across this crash by accidentally leaving > -fvar-tracking-assignments off the link line. Improper usage that cause > crashes/ICEs are still worth PRs, right? Yes. We're going to have more of these I guess and need to sort out a general policy (we could for example error out on more "incompatible" switch combinations - or silently enable switches). Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41230
