------- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 10:00 -------
I'm not sure it needs really that much changes... After all, the semantics can
probably be simulated completely via replacing the BLOCK-constructs with
contained procedures that are called where the BLOCK originally was?
That's of course not a nice implementation and I do not think we should
actually do this, but I believe that there needs not be that much change --
I'll work on this and try to find out a good way.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-04-03 16:43:38 |2009-08-30 10:00:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39626
