------- Comment #41 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-17 22:39 -------
(In reply to comment #40)

One more thing: my previous benchmarks were wrong, I had an error in my setup. 
With a correct benchmark, polyhedron improves slightly in the testcases where
the change is outside the measurement noise.  This includes capacita.f90 which
gains some 2%.  Further, and as expected, with the patch, Thomas's testcases
from comment #6 both run at the same speed that only the 'call by value'
version did without the patch.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593

  • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
  • ... Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
  • ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
  • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply via email to