------- Comment #15 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-14 18:12 -------
I'm wondering if instead we can't simply mark all arguments to the transfer
functions in PRINT, WRITE and INTENT(IN) arguments as 'const *' instead of '*'.
 Are there any reasons against this?  I can't think of any except that this
would mean adding a new set of transfer functions to the library.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593

  • ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
    • ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
    • ... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply via email to