------- Comment #5 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 14:21 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm, I tought GCC was doing the same thing for years. So we need > abstract function for each inline?
Why? I think we each inlined copy (and the outlined copy) to refer to the one abstract copy. The problem is the links from the inlined copies to the outlined copy. Meanwhile I'll try to work around this in GDB. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40573
