New SRA, revision 147980:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00959.html
miscompiled binutils in CVS on Linux/x86-64:
FAIL: CFI on x86-64
FAIL: CFI on i386
FAIL: i386 general
FAIL: i386 naked reg
FAIL: i386 opcodes
FAIL: i386 opcodes (Intel disassembly)
FAIL: i386 opcodes (w/ suffix)
FAIL: i386 intel
FAIL: i386 intel-ok
FAIL: i386 katmai
FAIL: i386 ssemmx2
FAIL: i386 sse2
FAIL: i386 sub
FAIL: i386 immed
FAIL: i386 equates
FAIL: i386 amdfam10
FAIL: i386 merom
FAIL: i386 SSE4.1
FAIL: i386 SSE4.1 (Intel disassembly)
FAIL: i386 SSE4.2
FAIL: i386 SSE4.2 (Intel disassembly)
FAIL: i386 SIMD
FAIL: i386 SIMD (Intel mode)
FAIL: i386 SIMD (with suffixes)
FAIL: i386 reg
FAIL: i386 reg (Intel mode)
FAIL: i386 arch 1
FAIL: i386 arch 2
FAIL: i386 arch 3
FAIL: i386 arch 10
FAIL: i386 AES
FAIL: i386 AES (Intel mode)
FAIL: i386 PCLMUL
FAIL: i386 PCLMUL (Intel mode)
FAIL: i386 AVX
FAIL: i386 AVX (Intel disassembly)
FAIL: i386 SSE with AVX encoding
FAIL: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
FAIL: i386 arch avx 1
FAIL: i386 arch-avx-1-5
FAIL: i386 reloc
FAIL: i386 white
FAIL: i386 gotpc
FAIL: i386 dynamic tls
FAIL: i386 pic tls
FAIL: i386 non-pic tls
FAIL: i386 relocs
FAIL: i386 reloc32
FAIL: x86_64
FAIL: x86-64 opcode
FAIL: x86-64 pcrel
FAIL: x86-64 amdfam10
FAIL: x86-64 immed
FAIL: x86-64 merom
FAIL: x86-64 SSE4.1
FAIL: x86-64 SSE4.1 (Intel disassembly)
FAIL: Run with libdwarf1.so first
FAIL: x86-64 SSE4.2
FAIL: x86-64 SSE4.2 (Intel disassembly)
FAIL: Run with libdwarf1.so last
FAIL: x86-64 SIMD
FAIL: x86-64 SIMD (Intel mode)
FAIL: x86-64 SIMD (with suffixes)
FAIL: x86-64 reg
FAIL: x86-64 reg (Intel mode)
FAIL: 64bit illegal opcodes
FAIL: 64bit illegal opcodes (Intel mode)
FAIL: x86-64 REX.W optimization
FAIL: ld-elf/eh4
FAIL: x86-64 arch 1
FAIL: x86-64 arch 2
FAIL: x86-64 AES
FAIL: x86-64 AES (Intel mode)
FAIL: x86-64 PCLMUL
FAIL: x86-64 PCLMUL (Intel mode)
FAIL: x86-64 AVX
FAIL: x86-64 AVX (Intel mode)
FAIL: x86-64 SSE with AVX encoding
FAIL: x86-64 SSE without AVX equivalent
FAIL: x86-64 relocs
FAIL: i386 reloc64
FAIL: preinit array
FAIL: static preinit array
FAIL: init array
FAIL: static init array
FAIL: fini array
FAIL: static fini array
FAIL: Build libcomm1.o
FAIL: Run normal with libfoo.so
FAIL: Run protected with libfoo.so
FAIL: Run hidden with libfoo.so
FAIL: Run normal with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run warn with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run protected with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run hidden with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run normal libbar.so with libfoo.so
FAIL: Run protected libbar.so with libfoo.so
FAIL: Run hidden libbar.so with libfoo.so
FAIL: Run normal libbar.so with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run protected libbar.so with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run hidden libbar.so with versioned libfoo.so
FAIL: Run dl1a with --dynamic-list=dl1.list and dlopen on libdl1.so
FAIL: Run dl1b with --dynamic-list-data and dlopen on libdl1.so
FAIL: Run dl6a1 with --dynamic-list-data and dlopen on libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6a2 with -Bsymbolic-functions and dlopen on libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6a3 with -Bsymbolic and dlopen on libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6a4 with -Bsymbolic --dynamic-list-data and dlopen on libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6a5 with -Bsymbolic-functions --dynamic-list-cpp-new and dlopen on
libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6a6 with --dynamic-list-cpp-new -Bsymbolic-functions and dlopen on
libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6a7 with --dynamic-list-data -Bsymbolic and dlopen on libdl6a.so
FAIL: Run dl6b1 with --dynamic-list-data and dlopen on libdl6b.so
FAIL: Run dl6b2 with dlopen on libdl6b.so
FAIL: Run dl6c1 with --dynamic-list-data and dlopen on libdl6c.so
FAIL: Run dl6d1 with --dynamic-list-data and dlopen on libdl6d.so
FAIL: Run with libdata1.so
FAIL: Run with libfunc1.so comm1.o
FAIL: Run with comm1.o libfunc1.so
FAIL: Run with libdl3a.so
FAIL: Run with libdl3b.so
FAIL: Run with libdl3c.so
FAIL: Run with libwrap1a.so and libwrap1b.so
FAIL: Run with libwrap1b.so and libwrap1a.so
FAIL: visibility (hidden)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected)
FAIL: visibility (protected) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def)
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main)
FAIL: visibility (normal)
FAIL: visibility (normal) (PIC main)
FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions
FAIL: TLS descriptor -fpic -shared transitions
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: TLS descriptor -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared
FAIL: TLS with global dynamic and descriptors
FAIL: Absolute non-overflowing relocs
FAIL: PCREL8 overflow
FAIL: PCREL16 overflow
FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386
FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-i386
FAIL: weak undefined
FAIL: weak undefined data
FAIL: shared
FAIL: shared -Bsymbolic
FAIL: shared (PIC main)
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: TLS descriptor -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: Absolute non-overflowing relocs
FAIL: PCREL8 overflow
FAIL: PCREL16 overflow
--
Summary: [4.5 Regression] New SRA miscompiled binutils
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40493
