------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-16 09:46 -------
With the patch in comment #2 I get:
=== libffi tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
unix/-m64
Running target unix
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp ...
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp ...
=== libffi Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes 1594
# of expected failures 10
# of unsupported tests 15
Running target unix/-m64
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp ...
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 1.0
0.0
1.0 2.0
? should match 1.0 2.0
?.0 2.0
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 output pattern test, is 1.0 0.0
1.0 2.0
? should match 1.0 2.0
?.0 2.0
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O3 output pattern test, is 1.0 0.0
1.0 2.0
? should match 1.0 2.0
?.0 2.0
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -Os output pattern test, is 1.0 0.0
1.0 2.0
? should match 1.0 2.0
?.0 2.0
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern
test, is 1.0 0.0
1.0 2.0
? should match 1.0 2.0
?.0 2.0
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/libffi/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp ...
=== libffi Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 1589
# of unexpected failures 5
# of expected failures 10
# of unsupported tests 15
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 3183
# of unexpected failures 5
# of expected failures 20
# of unsupported tests 30
Thanks for the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40444
