------- Comment #3 from plivings at arb dot ca dot gov 2009-06-12 18:03 ------- Subject: RE: variable length still 6 ???
Bud, Thanks for your response to my earlier bug report, and sorry for not informing you earlier that the bug was apparently related to the computer OS-Compiler mismatch. I had the OS-compiler changed to 64-bit from 32-bit, and the problem disappeared. Thanks again for your attention and time. With best regards, Paul -----Original Message----- From: bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:17 AM To: Livingstone, p...@arb Subject: [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? ------- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 ------- i created a compilable example from the code snippet given: INTEGER PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) INTEGER NCSP0,IARRAY2,I NCSP0 = 1 IARRAY2 = 0 DO I = 2, 341 IARRAY2 = IARRAY2 + 1 PBLJARRAYPT(I,I,NCSP0) = IARRAY2 END DO PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) PRINT*,'PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) = ',PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) END When ran, it gives PBLJARRAYPT(2,2,1) = 1 PBLJARRAYPT(3,3,1) = 2 PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) = 340 which looks fine to me. Unless more info is forthcoming on reproducing this bug, I think we should close it with no further action taken. It's only been open a month, doesn't hurt to let it sit for another :) --bud -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40149
