------- Comment #4 from reuter at mail dot desy dot de 2009-06-11 19:31 ------- Subject: Re: Internal error in connection with optimization and allocatable objects
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote: Thanks for the explanations. I actually cannot change the priority, only the assignee or a specifically empowered user can change the status. > > > ------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-11 15:23 > ------- >> I'm not so much of an export in the terminology. What exactly does >> regression mean? > > It means that a code worked at revision n (here 4.4.0) and no longer at > revision n+1 (here 4.5.0). This means that either something has been broken by > some change or a bug has been exposed by it. Since changes are supposed to > improve any piece of code, regressions have in general a higher priority than > other bugs, so it is important to mark them in the subject line (look at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2009-06/ for examples). Since I don't have the > rights to change the subject line, you have to do it yourself or wait for some > maintainer to do it. > >> The option -m64 does work. What exactly does it do? > > It forces the compilation in "64 bit mode" while the default in Darwin is 32 > bit. I don't know the detail of the differences besides the fact that the > addresses are coded on 64 bits instead of 32 and in general the code runs > faster (~10 to 20%) with -m64. > > Note that I provided the information in the hope to help those who will fix > the > bug, meanwhile you can use -m64 as a workaround. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40413 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > ------------------------------------ Juergen Reuter Albrecht-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg Physikalisches Institut Hermann-Herder-Str. 3 79104 Freiburg, GERMANY Tel.: +49-761-203-8407 Skype: jr_reuter ------------------------------------ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40413
