------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-15 10:06 -------
Particularly the dependent_type_p -> dependent_scope_p change in
finish_id_expression makes the difference here.  BIT_NOT_EXPR of a RECORD_TYPE
makes it through till tsubsting and isn't errored as invalid use of destructor
in that case.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40139

Reply via email to