------- Comment #3 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-05-09 18:52 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt
Hi,
I am testing the following:
Index: cgraphunit.c
===================================================================
--- cgraphunit.c (revision 147319)
+++ cgraphunit.c (working copy)
@@ -1762,7 +1762,12 @@ cgraph_materialize_all_clones (void)
for (e = node->callees; e; e = e->next_callee)
{
tree decl = gimple_call_fndecl (e->call_stmt);
- if (decl != e->callee->decl)
+ /* When function gets inlined, indirect inlining might've invented
+ new edge for orginally indirect stmt. Since we are not
+ preserving clones in the original form, we must not update here
+ since other inline clones don't need to contain call to the same
+ call. Inliner will do the substitution for us later. */
+ if (decl && decl != e->callee->decl)
{
gimple new_stmt;
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
@@ -1808,6 +1813,9 @@ cgraph_materialize_all_clones (void)
verify_cgraph_node (node);
#endif
}
+#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
+ verify_cgraph ();
+#endif
cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes (false, cgraph_dump_file);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080
