------- Comment #31 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-29 01:03 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++ exported
> Also, libstdc++.so is definitely not the right home for __signbitl symbol, so > we definitely shouldn't allow any newly linked program to use symbol from that > library. If __signbitl is ever needed (prove it), then it belongs to libc.so > and libm.so, not into libstdc++.so. I agree. Further, the implementation that leaked in 4.2 and 4.3 may have been broken since it assumed a 128-bit long double format. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
