------- Comment #6 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-04-27 15:32 ------- Subject: Re: 96% performance regression in floating point code; part of the problem started 2009/03/12-13
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 15:26 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > This is by design -O1 is way slower than -O2 now. I have seen no general discussion that -O1 should be destroyed as a useful compilation option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39914
