------- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-25 17:16 -------
Here's a testcase (doesn't "work" without the extra subroutine): 

$> cat goto.for
      i = 1
      DO
        CALL inc(i)
        IF (i == 5) GOTO 100
      END DO
100   PRINT *, "done"
      END

      SUBROUTINE inc(n)
        INTEGER n
        n = n + 1
      END SUBROUTINE

$> gfortran-svn -Wall -W goto.for
[no warning]

$> gfortran-svn -Wall -W warning.for -fwhole-file
goto.for:6.3:

100   PRINT *, "done"
   1
goto.for:4.72:

        IF (i == 5) GOTO 100
                                                                        2
Warning: Label at (1) is not in the same block as the GOTO statement at (2)


If this case is related to the ICE, I don't know, however, I observed both
together.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39896

Reply via email to