------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 15:30 ------- But in the end the different types are really the problem. Several issues in the value-numberer though:
- throwing stmts are not value numbered - pointers are needlessly value numbered with their types - reference ops all have types, but during valueization the types are not valueized - component refs refer to field decls, thus reference ops are not only based on offset/size of the access. I am testing if value-numbering throwing stmts will pass Java testing. That helps functions besides foo at least. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39885
