------- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-07 20:46 ------- Subject: Re: Trouble with new random bits
> Well, *cannot* be still an issue exactly in these terms, because there are no > log2* functions any more in the code... You are correct. The log2 fails are gone. We are left with the following: FAIL: 26_numerics/random/knuth_b.cc execution test FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48.cc execution test FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48_base.cc execution test Assertion failed: a() == 1112339016, file /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsui te/26_numerics/random/knuth_b.cc, line 37 FAIL: 26_numerics/random/knuth_b.cc execution test Assertion failed: a() == 249142670248501ull, file /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3 /testsuite/26_numerics/random/ranlux48.cc, line 37 FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48.cc execution test Assertion failed: a() == 61839128582725ull, file /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ testsuite/26_numerics/random/ranlux48_base.cc, line 37 FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48_base.cc execution test Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39652
