------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 09:23 -------
from error.c(error_print)
00470 case 'u':
00471 arg[pos].type = TYPE_UINTEGER;
00472
00473 case 'l':
00474 c = *format++;
00475 if (c == 'u')
00476 arg[pos].type = TYPE_ULONGINT;
00477 else if (c == 'i' || c == 'd')
00478 arg[pos].type = TYPE_LONGINT;
00479 else
00480 gcc_unreachable ();
00481 break;
....so, yes, without analysis I would say that the report is correct.
Confirmed. I have given it the "wrong-code" keyword because it is likely to be
true and to raise this out of the noise.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-04-07 09:23:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39576
