------- Comment #7 from aran at 100acres dot us 2009-03-28 18:13 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Another fix is to #undef TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS as obviously netbsd is another > OS without a clue ... >
Please explain how an OS with a clue would handle this problem. Older binaries that use the pre-c99 complex structure links to the existing linker symbols, cabs and cabsf. Changing the meaning of these symbols to the c99 meaning would break these legacy programs. It seems cluefull to decorate these symbols with __c99_ and provide a rename in the header. What would be a better solution? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
