------- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 02:30 -------
Looks like I should punt and force "#define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED
cfun->calls_alloca" or "#define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED
cfun->has_nonlocal_label".
Apparently this is *not* one of the cases where "The compiler recognizes those
cases and automatically gives the function a frame pointer regardless of what
@code{FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED} says. You don't need to worry about
them."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38609
