------- Comment #2 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-17 14:02 ------- Yes.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg00362.html. We also cross post them to an RTEMS tool list and apparently the run on 12 March resulted in a log that was too large for gcc-testresults. http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-tooltestresults/2009-March/000232.html Is there anything I can do to help with this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35180
