------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-17 20:48 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > This looks target-dependent, isn't it?
It might be but the older RA was able to handle this better. Look at the patch and the decision that follows. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
