------- Comment #3 from pgrealis at yahoo-inc dot com 2009-02-17 11:20 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is perfectly valid C++.
I never claimed anything different. Is your argument that no warning should be
issued for "perfectly valid C++"?
"(int)1.5" is perfectly valid C++, yet -Wold-style-cast will emit a warning for
its use.
To close as INVALID, please refute the following:
> I can't think of a scenario where one would want to write x.f() over X::f()
> when f() is static.
--
pgrealis at yahoo-inc dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pgrealis at yahoo-inc dot
| |com
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39205
