------- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-02-14 02:08 ------- Correction, should have said:
-Thus, I conclude that the "-m32" for +Thus, I conclude that the "-m64" for -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39186
------- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-02-14 02:08 ------- Correction, should have said:
-Thus, I conclude that the "-m32" for +Thus, I conclude that the "-m64" for -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39186