------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-12 14:59 -------
Updating the description. Although anyone would agree that not warning is the
right thing to do, there doesn't seem to be any practical solution for this
problem, so I leave it as unconfirmed.
I wonder if clang/llvm gets this right.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Summary|Spurious warnings generated |Spurious warnings with -
|due to not optimizing first |Wreturn-type due to not
| |performing CCP/VRP in the
| |front-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31878
