------- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-02-09 21:09 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > No. This bug is about all targets, not just x86-64, and is about code which > follows extend.texi documentation (Extended Asm and Explicit Reg Vars) for > years (glibc e.g. uses it this way for more than 10 years). Do you suddenly > want to rule all that code invalid? > See glibc INLINE_SYSCALL and INTERNAL_SYSCALL macros on all arches, Linux > asm*/unistd.h _syscall* macros until very recently, etc. >
If you don't get ICE, you don't have to change anything. If you do get ICE, you may have to update. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39139
