struct N
{
private:
virtual ~N ();
};
N *
foo ()
{
return new N ();
}
used to compile until http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138355
Does it really need to have an accessible destructor if it is never deleted?
Dodji cited [basic.life]/4 which could mean this is valid.
Distilled from thunderbird.
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] Accessible constructor required for new
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39109
